I’ve been browsing through the ‘Blogs I follow’, trying to keep up with all the discussions, concerns and new releases and I’ve been seeing a lot of posts where authors are grumbling (quite rightly IMHO) about the trouble they’re having with squeezing their novel into a genre category.
And it’s not surprising. For instance, on Wikipedia, there are currently 80 genres and sub-genres listed under fiction alone. Yikes! My own novel, ‘A Construct of Angels’ would currently fit into the horror, romance, Urban fantasy, religious fantasy, thriller or mystery categories.
There are How-to-Write books on the market that happlily suggest that writers should choose a genre and write within its boundaries if they want to sell. But why should we have to work within such restrictions? We’re not aiming towards library shelves. Some of us aren’t even looking towards bookshops any more. The electronic age has changed all that.
In these days of indie eBook publishing, with sub-genres and even sub-sub-genres sprouting up, the whole idea of ‘genre’ feels overloaded and outdated. Of course, to declare that, an alternative is needed and here’s my (fledgling) idea;
Wouldn’t it benefit both readers and retailers if some sort of ‘tick box’ or a graphic system was introduced where the elements of the book can be highlighted (or illustrated) by a sliding colour scale such as we have with rated domestic applicances (in Europe at least)?
.
.
I experimented with a few variations on this theme and didn’t find them to be flexible enough as I was still having to insert genre labels. It was colourful, but no better in terms of classification. Perhaps you could see a way to make it work.
So I tried a pie chart instead. This is a simple chart, created using ten subjects that are most relevant to my debut novel ‘A Construct of Angels’;
Note that I said the ten most relevant subjects – there are others that I could justify adding in there, but ten is plenty. Perhaps ten is too many and five would suffice. Who knows? This is all hypothetical and open for discussion.
BTW, for you with your magnifying glasses against the screen, there’s only 0.5% sex in the story. 😀
In an ideal world, the catergories would be listed from most relevant to least relevant, top to bottom, thus;
This arrangement should make it easier for the potential buyer to interpret. They would be free to scan the top two or three subjects and decide if the story is for them or not. They might still be swayed if their favourite genre was listed as number four or five – something which wouldn’t happen if the book had been listed under ‘Thriller’ when they prefer to read about religion- or horror-based stories.
I don’t think it would be too difficult for an algorithmist like Amazon to feed the percentages into their version of Deep Thought deep in the heart of Amazonia and begin to categorise the books in this way.
As I said, this is all hypothetical.
Do you think the time has come for the library shelf-based genre categories to be given a shake-up? Perhaps you have a fledgling idea that leaves my suggestion eating dust.
If so, please share! I would be happy to eat humble pie chart. 🙂
.
Aug 23, 2013 @ 11:00:13
Genre to me is a label the reader should give the writer, not one the writer should give themselves. Or maybe just as a kick-start, as in…today I’m going to write something really scary! But I like your pie charts.
LikeLike
Aug 23, 2013 @ 13:12:44
That does make sense – but if we were to classify books that way, thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of books would remain in a genre-less limbo until a reader chose to classify them. And what would happen if readers disagreed?
LikeLike
Aug 10, 2013 @ 01:44:40
I agree that it’s time to move on to something new and commend your efforts here. Still, I think it must be simpler to use. Love your pie charts, but each one took seconds to digest via eye movement back-and-forth between the slices and the legend. That’s too long for those scanning titles (FAR too long for books on a shelf with their bindings facing out). The system needs to operate so quickly the perspective reader isn’t conscious they’re using it.
Perhaps a single letter for each genre (M = mystery, F = fantasy, R = romance, S = sci-fi, etc.) with a “strength” number beside it. Thus we get:
F/9
M/7
R/4
S/1
If it helped this could be color coded…perhaps use a pie chart with the numbers on it. The eye would instantly process the color/number association. I’d suggest the slices be of standard size and positioning…let the numbers describe the strength. Tiny slices are too difficult to read unless you devote a lot of room and then (again) they’re too time consuming. Too, there should be fewer categories. It might be possible to indicate sub-genres for those who care. Have the writer decide designations. Amazon certainly isn’t going to pay people to read your stories and rate them.
LikeLike
Aug 11, 2013 @ 18:28:07
Yes, it needs to be quick and easy to read – which is (again) where five may score over ten. Plus it needs to work in miniature – i.e. if printed on the spine of a book.
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 16:12:43
Now that I see you mapping it out in more detail here, I am even more supportive of this idea. And I could see this actually working in tandem with the categories, rather than replacing. For example, if my book was 75% fantasy on the chart above, the algorithm would place me higher than fantasy than the other categories. If someone came across my book, they could then drill down and see the other components, and decide if it had the right mix of whatever they were looking for.
I think we might not be too far off with something like this, either. Categories have been expanding all the time, and at some point they are going to need to evolve. Hopefully the right person sees this post and it makes some waves!
LikeLike
Aug 11, 2013 @ 18:32:16
It still needs a lot of work, but if we can generate something workable, then it may gain more support. You may be right in that a complete change would be too drastic. A half-way house – supporting the existing system as you said – may be best for now. We can always take over the world at a later date. Mwuhahaha.
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 13:55:18
It’s a novel approaching to an increasingly complex situation. Personally, I feel that the whole categorisation issue has got way out of hand.
As you mention in your post, there are now so many sub-genres that the lines are getting blurred. I don’t believe we need that many and I think authors are playing into the hands of evil – OK, that’s a bit strong, but indulge me 🙂 – by worrying so much about whether they’ve penned a young-adult-vampire-romance-suspense-thriller-cop-drama-kitchen-sink-novella.
We need to pull back and start classifying our own works as ‘mystery’, ‘horror’, ‘historical drama’ etc. and actually leave it up to people – *gasp* – to do some of the work themselves. There’s such a desperation, caused by the immense proliferation of available titles in the digital era, to over-define so that new readers can find you. Sure, there are many many more books out there now, but even so.
You’re entirely right that we’re pigeon-holing ourselves and limiting our creative freedom – which is probably what drove us all to write in the first place. I firmly believe that writers contribute to the problem and writers can fix it.
So, rather than defining a new classification system (which I admire your efforts at BTW), I reckon we need to do away with 90% of the classifications altogether and simplify. Keep It Simple Stupid. (Not aimed at you, obviously…)
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 14:34:02
That makes a lot of sense. Maybe we just need half a dozen classifiers each of which is lots-some-none. So by and large I like historical or futuristic material rather than contemporary… but I am not keen on books with loads of gore and so would like to know that regardless of the era. A big problem is just knowing how to present this – I personally am comfortable with pie charts, but a great many people are not. I have this weird picture of someone picking up the book and saying “yuk I don’t like text books” before putting it down again…
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 15:58:07
Thanks for the big KISS, Jon. :*
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 16:02:22
But you’re correct in that the whole thing has gotten way out of hand. We’re picking on the minutae of the subject material in a book in order to classify it. However, there are many genre-crossing books out there that wouldn’t have been allowed to see the light of day if they’d gone to a ‘traditional’ publisher, so the sub-genre explosion began. Do we go back to simple library-shelf classification or do we reinvent the rotary centrally-loaded perambulation capability device?
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 12:16:17
I think this is a really interesting idea, Andrew, though suspect as you suggest that 10 categories is way too many for most folk to bother about. Also, I wonder how this sort of system would be regulated? (or if it should be!) I mean, there could easily be a vested advantage in me, shall we say, elevating the proportion of some elements in order to attract potential readers. Maybe it needs not so much a quantitative approach but a qualitative one, eg “historical fiction: high… religion:medium… romance:moderate… supernatural:trace” etc. The pie chart gives what might be a spurious sense of exactness.
LikeLike
Aug 09, 2013 @ 12:21:37
That was why I looked at the appliance rating graph first – but I couldn’t see it as an improvement in the end. Please feel free to build upon the pie chart idea, though. Yes, it is down to trust. The reader must trust the author to provide a fair representation of the content – or it all falls apart.
LikeLike